Releases Saturday 4 November 2000
No 7269 Volume 321

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).


(1) ARE MOBILE PHONES REDUCING TEENAGE
SMOKING?

(2) NOSEBLEEDS MORE LIKELY TO OCCUR IN THE
MORNING

(3) DOCTORS' FEAR OF SIDE EFFECTS FOR HEART
FAILURE TREATMENT IS UNJUSTIFIED

(4) CELEBRATING THE PAST AND SHAPING THE
FUTURE



(1) ARE MOBILE PHONES REDUCING TEENAGE
SMOKING?

(Decline in teenage smoking with rise in mobile phone
ownership: hypothesis)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1155

Is there a link between the sharp decline in teenage smoking
since 1996 and the dramatic rise in mobile phone ownership
among teenagers over the same period? A letter in this
week's BMJ argues that mobile phones may be competing
successfully with cigarettes to meet certain important teenage
needs.

Smoking among 15 year olds fell from 30% to 23% between
1996 and 1999, while mobile phone ownership among 15-17
year olds rose from low levels in 1996 to 70% by August
2000. Clive Bates and Anne Charlton hypothesise that these
trends are related because some teenagers will be unable to
afford both and that the mobile satisfies the same teenage
needs as smoking - offering adult style and aspiration,
individuality, sociability, rebellion, and peer group bonding.

For teenagers, smoking may become seen as "old
technology", suggest the authors, with the bright new world of
text messaging, email and WAP becoming the new
aspirational gateway to adult life.

Data on teenage smoking are not yet available for 2000 but,
if the authors' hypothesis is correct, the continued rise of the
mobile phone as a competitor to cigarettes may drive teenage
smoking rates down further.

Further information including the original data is available at:
www.ash.org.uk/?embargo

Contact:

Clive Bates, Director, Action on Smoking and Health,
London, UK
Email: clive.bates@dial.pipex.com

(2) NOSEBLEEDS MORE LIKELY TO OCCUR IN THE
MORNING

(Circadian variation in onset of epistaxis: analysis of hospital
admissions)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1112

Most nosebleeds seem to occur either in the morning or the
evening, suggesting that nosebleeds follow a 24-hour
(circadian) pattern similar to that of blood pressure, finds a
study in this week's BMJ

Manfredini and colleagues reviewed all cases of nosebleeds
from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1998 in the emergency
department of St Anna Hospital in Ferrara, Italy. For each of
the 1741 nosebleeds reported, the time of onset was
calculated - either within a 30-minute range or, where this
was not possible, a range of within three hours. The age, sex
and details of any underlying diseases amongst these patients
were also recorded.

The authors found a highly significant circadian rhythm for
nosebleeds, with a primary peak in the morning (8.24am) and
a smaller secondary peak in the evening. This pattern was
similar in both men (8.12am) and women (8.44am) say the
authors, but age had no influence on this pattern, they add.

It is interesting that this biphasic pattern closely resembles the
circadian rhythm of blood pressure, say the authors,
suggesting that blood pressure might trigger or contribute to
nosebleeds. Other factors related to venous bleeding and that
might also show circadian variation deserve further
investigation, they conclude.

Contact:

Roberto Manfredini, Professor of Emergency Medicine
University of Ferrara Medical School, Italy.
Email: r.manfredini@unife.it

(3) DOCTORS' FEAR OF SIDE EFFECTS FOR HEART
FAILURE TREATMENT IS UNJUSTIFIED

(Safety and costs of initiating angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors for heart failure in primary care: analysis of
individual patient data from studies of left ventricular
dysfunction)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1113

(Editorial: Taking heart failure seriously)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1095

Doctors' fear of the side effects associated with drugs to treat
heart failure may be a major barrier to their use in general
practice, despite strong evidence for their effectiveness,
according to a study in this week's BMJ.

Mason and colleagues examined the risks associated with
starting treatment in patients with symptoms of heart failure,
using data from previous large trials. Over 7000 patients
received a test dose of the drug enalapril (an angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitor). Of these, less than 2% reported
side effects severe enough to stop treatment. More than 2500
patients were then randomly treated with either enalapril or
placebo (a chemically inert substance given in place of a
drug). During the first year of treatment, there was no
difference in the rates of side effects leading to dose reduction
or withdrawal between the enalapril and placebo groups.

These findings show that the introduction of angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors rarely cause problems, and can
be safely started for patients with heart failure in primary care,
say the authors. Doctors' perceptions of the risks of these
drugs may sometimes be exaggerated, they conclude.

In an accompanying editorial, Cleland and colleagues argue
that lack of resources and expertise - not fear of side effects -
are the great barriers to efficient treatment of heart failure.
"Proper diagnosis and supervision of treatment for Britain's
most common malignant disease should not be beyond the
resources of our National Health Service," they conclude.

Contacts:

[Paper]: James Mason, Senior Research Fellow, University
of York, UK
Email: jmm7@york.ac.uk

[Editorial]: Professor John Cleland, Castle Hill Hospital,
Kingston upon Hull, UK

or

Andrew Clark, Department of Cardiology, University of Hull,
UK

(4) CELEBRATING THE PAST AND SHAPING THE
FUTURE

(Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a
new partnership for high quality healthcare)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1129

(The role of complementary and alternative medicine)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1133

(Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collections)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7269/1146

The Millennium Festival of Medicine - a programme of events
running throughout 2000 to celebrate innovation and
achievement - holds its keynote conference in London next
week. Several articles in this week's BMJ are based on
presentations from this event, exploring some of the
challenges and dilemmas medicine faces as we enter the 21st
century.

As more and more patients make use of online health
resources, there will be increasing demands for physicians to
communicate electronically with their patients, writes Tom
Ferguson, Professor of Health Informatics at the University of
Texas. He reports on the benefits of communicating with
patients online, and suggests that online patient services can
help physicians provide better care in less time.

The use of complementary and alternative medicine is
currently around 20% in the UK and is predicted to grow in
popularity, according to Edzard Ernst at the University of
Exeter. He reports that much complementary and alternative
medicine remains opinion based, and calls for unbiased
scientific evaluation in the future to ensure patients and
healthcare providers know which forms are safe and
effective.

The recent controversy surrounding the creation of a
population based DNA collection in Iceland provides
important lessons for those embarking on a similar exercise in
the UK, write Jane Kaye and Paul Martin. They argue that
public debate concerning the possible use and misuse of
sensitive genetic information and a clear legal framework for
research activities are needed to avoid public opposition to
the proposed UK Population Biomedical Collection.
"Without widespread public support for population genetic
studies, there is a real danger that human genetics could
become the next biotechnology scare," they conclude.

For further information visit The Millennium Festival of
Medicine website at: www.medicine2000.org

Contacts:

Tom Ferguson, Adjunct Associate Professor of Health
Informatics, University of Texas-Houston, USA
Email: doctom@doctom.com
Website: www.fergusonreport.com

Edzard Ernst, Director, Department of Complementary
Medicine, University of Exeter, UK
Email: E.Ernst@ex.ac.uk

Jane Kaye, Doctoral Student, St Catherine's College,
University of Oxford, UK
Email: jane.kaye@law.ox.ac.uk

or

Paul Martin, Genetics and Society Unit, School of Sociology
and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, UK
Email: 100145.55@compuserve.com


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)