Releases Saturday 1 September 2001
No 7311 Volume 323

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).



(1) SEVENTEEN PER CENT OF VETERANS
BELIEVE THEY HAVE GULF WAR SYNDROME

(2) BULLYING CAN LEAD TO EMOTIONAL
PROBLEMS, ESPECIALLY IN GIRLS

(3) ACUPUNCTURE IS A SAFE TREATMENT IN
SKILLED HANDS

(4) TEENAGERS NOT AT HIGHER RISK DURING
FIRST BIRTH, BUT A SECOND MAY LEAD TO
COMPLICATIONS

(5) DECISION AIDS HELP PATIENTS CHOOSE
BEST TREATMENT OPTIONS



(1) SEVENTEEN PER CENT OF VETERANS
BELIEVE THEY HAVE GULF WAR SYNDROME

(Prevalence of Gulf war veterans who believe they have
Gulf war syndrome: questionnaire study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/473

Seventeen per cent of Gulf war veterans believe they
have Gulf war syndrome, find researchers in this week's
BMJ. The study has implications for future health
protection programmes intended to protect against the
threat of chemical and biological warfare.

Questionnaires were sent to a large random sample of
British service personnel who served in the 1991 Gulf
war. Of 2961 respondents, 17% believed they had Gulf
war syndrome. A combination of biological,
psychological, and sociological factors were associated
with this belief. For instance, these personnel were
more likely to have poor health, know someone else
who also believed they had the condition, and have
received a high number of vaccinations before
deployment to the Gulf.

If this sample is representative, about 9,000 of 53,000
British service personnel believe they have Gulf war
syndrome, say the authors. The future health needs of
all service personnel should now be considered, they
conclude.

Contact:

Trudie Chalder, Department of Psychological Medicine,
Guy's, King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine,
London, UK
Email: sphatrc@iop.kcl.ac.uk

(2) BULLYING CAN LEAD TO EMOTIONAL
PROBLEMS, ESPECIALLY IN GIRLS

(Does bullying cause emotional problems? A
prospective study of young teenagers)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/480

A history of bullying predicts the onset of anxiety or
depressive symptoms, especially in young teenage girls,
finds a study in this week's BMJ.

Over 2,600 secondary school students in Victoria,
Australia were surveyed about bullying, twice in year 8
(aged 13 years) and 12 months later, at the end of year
9. Students were classified as victimised if they
answered "yes" to four types of victimisation: being
teased, having rumours spread about them, being
deliberately excluded, or experiencing physical threats
or violence.

The level of victimisation was high and relatively stable
in this group. Two thirds of the students who were
bullied recurrently in year 8 also reported being bullied
in year 9. A history of victimisation was a strong
predictor of self-reported symptoms of anxiety and
depression, even after taking into account other
measures of social relations. This was especially the
case for girls.

Further work is needed to determine if a reduction in
bullying can reduce the onset of anxiety and depressive
symptoms in teenagers, say the authors, but the
indications from this study are that such a reduction
could have a substantial impact on the emotional
wellbeing of young people, they conclude.

Contact:

Lyndal Bond, Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal
Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
Email: bond@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au

(3) ACUPUNCTURE IS A SAFE TREATMENT IN
SKILLED HANDS

(Adverse events following acupuncture: prospective
survey of 32 000 consultations with doctors and
physiotherapists)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/485

(The York acupuncture safety study: prospective survey
of 34 000 treatments by traditional acupuncturists)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/486

(Editorial: The safety of acupuncture)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/467

Acupuncture is a relatively safe form of treatment in the
hands of a competent practitioner, conclude two
reports in this week's BMJ. Being the first studies in the
United Kingdom to systematically examine both the rate
and nature of adverse effects of acupuncture, they
provide important evidence on public health and safety
of acupuncture.

In the first study, 78 doctors and physiotherapists who
performed acupuncture recorded any adverse events
that occurred between June 1998 and February 2000.
They reported no serious adverse events and 671 minor
adverse events per 10,000 acupuncture consultations.
These rates are classified as minimal, however, 14 per
10,000 of these minor events were reported as
significant.

Some avoidable adverse events occurred, and
acupuncturists might consider modifying their practice to
reduce the incidence of such events, conclude the
authors.

In the second study, 574 members of the British
Acupuncture Council participated in a postal audit of
treatments undertaken during a four week period in
2000. No serious adverse events were reported after
34,407 acupuncture treatments. Comparison of this
adverse event rate with those of drugs routinely
prescribed in primary care suggests that acupuncture is
a relatively safe form of treatment, conclude the authors.

Despite some study limitations, the conclusion that, in
skilled hands, acupuncture is one of the safer forms of
medical intervention seems justified, writes Professor
Charles Vincent in an accompanying editorial. Most
encouragingly, these studies represent a serious and
systematic attempt by acupuncture practitioners to
address the issue of patient safety, he concludes.

Contacts:

[Paper 1]: Adrian White, Senior Lecturer, Department
of Complementary Medicine, University of Exeter, UK
Email: a.r.white@ex.ac.uk

[Paper 2]: Hugh MacPherson, Research Director,
Foundation for Traditional Chinese Medicine, York,
UK
Email: hugh@ftcm.org.uk

[Editorial]: Charles Vincent, Professor of Psychology,
Department of Psychology, University College London,
UK
Email: c.vincent@ucl.ac.uk

(4) TEENAGERS NOT AT HIGHER RISK DURING
FIRST BIRTH, BUT A SECOND MAY LEAD TO
COMPLICATIONS

(Teenage pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal
outcomes associated with first and second births:
population based retrospective cohort study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/476

Teenagers giving birth for the first time are not at
increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
However, those having second births run an almost
threefold risk of premature delivery and stillbirth,
concludes a study in this week's BMJ.

Researchers at Glasgow University identified over
110,000 non-smoking women, aged between 15 and
29 years, who gave birth for the first or second time
between 1992 and 1998. Risks of adverse outcomes,
such as low birth weight, premature birth, still birth, and
emergency caesarean section were analysed for two
age groups: women aged 15-19 and women aged
20-29. Factors, such as smoking, social deprivation,
and previous abortions were taken into account.

They found that non-smoking women aged 15-19
having a first birth were not at higher risk of adverse
pregnancy outcomes, compared with women aged
20-29. By contrast, second births among 15-19 year
olds were associated with an almost threefold risk of
extremely premature birth and stillbirth compared with
older women.

These findings contradict previous studies, which
suggested that first teenage births were associated with
adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, these studies
failed to account for important environmental factors
such as maternal smoking, explain the authors. The
current study is also the first to show clearly that
teenagers having their second baby are at significantly
increased risk of pregnancy complications. This
appeared to be independent of environmental factors
but further work will be required to confirm or refute a
biological cause for these findings, they conclude.

Contact:

Gordon Smith, Professor of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, UK
Email: gcs4@cornell.edu

(5) DECISION AIDS HELP PATIENTS CHOOSE
BEST TREATMENT OPTIONS

(Randomised controlled trial of an interactive
multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement
therapy in primary care)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/490

(Randomised controlled trial of an interactive
multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy
in primary care)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/493

(Editorial: A key medical decision maker: the patient)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7311/466

Interactive decision aids improves patient knowledge
and can help patients play a more active part in making
decisions about their treatment, suggest two studies in
this week's BMJ.

In the first study, 205 women in the UK considering
hormone replacement treatment were randomly given
either normal clinical care or a computer-based
interactive decision aid by their general practitioners.
The decision aid was acceptable to both the patients
and their general practitioners. It enhanced the women's
understanding of the effects of hormone replacement
therapy and seemed to reduce decisional conflict.
Patients who viewed the programme played a more
active part in the decision making process and were no
more anxious than those who received normal care.

In the second study, much the same conclusions were
drawn about a decision aid for men considering
treatment for prostate problems. Such aids could be
introduced throughout the NHS at relatively low cost by
using the internet, conclude the authors.

Nevertheless, many questions remain, writes Professor
Richard Deyo in an accompanying editorial. For
example, how can we ensure that presentations are
objective and balanced, rather than designed to lead
patients to a particular conclusion? How will
programmes be continuously updated, and who will
support this work?

If such questions can be addressed we might expect to
have better informed patients, a more meaningful
consent process, and more consistent practice patterns,
he concludes.

Contact:

Angela Coulter, Chief Executive, Picker Institute
Europe, Oxford, UK
Email: angela.coulter@pickereurope.ac.uk


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)