Releases Saturday 10 November 2001
No 7321 Volume 323

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles). 



(1)  ACTIVE EUTHANASIA AND PHYSICIAN
ASSISTED SUICIDE SHOULD BE LEGALISED

(2)  CHICKENPOX DEATHS IN ADULTS ARE
INCREASING

(3)  FOODBORNE INFECTIONS IN THE HOME
LINKED TO SOCIAL FUNCTIONS

(4)  CURRENT NHS APPOINTMENT SYSTEMS "ARE
STALE, AT BEST"

(5)  INTENSIVE TREATMENT DOES NOT REDUCE
VIOLENCE IN PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS


 

(1)  ACTIVE EUTHANASIA AND PHYSICIAN
ASSISTED SUICIDE SHOULD BE LEGALISED

(Editorial: Why active euthanasia and physician assisted
suicide should be legalised)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1079

Last month Diane Pretty was refused the legal right to
choose the circumstances of her own death. In this
week's BMJ, Professors Len and Lesley Doyal argue
that this decision is morally wrong and that the law
should be changed.

If Mrs Pretty was permanently and severely
incompetent, and if her doctors believed that medical
treatment could provide no benefit because of her
inability ever to engage in self directed activity, then
legally they could withdraw life sustaining treatments.
Yet, she cannot invite them actively to end her life and
to advise them about how this should be done.

This decision becomes all the more morally
questionable when we realise that Mrs Pretty can refuse
life sustaining treatment at any time, and her doctors are
legally obliged to respect her choice, say the authors. If
it can be morally right to allow some competent patients
to die at their own request, then it must be morally
justified to give them the medical wherewithal to kill
themselves, they reason.

It is open to debate whether what Mrs Pretty requires
can best be described as voluntary euthanasia or
physician assisted suicide, say the authors. To provide
either of these to appropriate patients who make a
competent request represents respect for their
autonomy and their desire to die with what they
perceive to be dignity, they conclude.

Contact:

Lesley Doyal, Professor in Health and Social Care,
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Email: l.doyal@bristol.ac.uk
 

(2)  CHICKENPOX DEATHS IN ADULTS ARE
INCREASING

(Deaths from chickenpox in England and Wales
1995-7: analysis of routine mortality data)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1091

Chickenpox causes considerable death in adults and
may be increasing in importance, finds a study in this
week's BMJ.

Researchers in London reviewed death certificates from
1995-7 that mentioned "chickenpox" or "varicella."
Further information was obtained from the physicians
responsible for the patients to clarify the diagnosis.

They found that chickenpox accounts for about 25
deaths annually in England and Wales, more than from
measles, mumps, whooping cough, and Hib meningitis
combined. Furthermore, deaths in adults have been
increasing for at least 30 years and now 81% of deaths
from chickenpox are in adults.

Deaths were twice as common in men as in women,
add the authors. Men aged 15-44 years accounted for
almost half the confirmed male deaths and over a
quarter of all confirmed deaths from chickenpox.

A chickenpox vaccine is available, though not yet
licensed in the United Kingdom. However, these results
do not on their own provide sufficient evidence for mass
vaccination, say the authors. "We need information not
only on the burden of disease at primary and secondary
care levels, but also of the effect of the vaccine on
herpes zoster. We also need to ensure a high enough
uptake so that the disease does not shift towards the
older population and a higher mortality," they conclude.

Contact:

Professor Norman Noah, London School of Hygiene
and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Email:  giovanni.orsi@uniroma1.it
 

(3)  FOODBORNE INFECTIONS IN THE HOME
LINKED TO SOCIAL FUNCTIONS

(General outbreaks of infectious intestinal diseases
linked with private residences in England and Wales,
1992-9: questionnaire study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1097

Although there has been a downward trend in
outbreaks of infectious intestinal diseases in the home,
food is the predominant transmitter of infection, and
seems to be linked to social functions such as
barbecues and dinner parties, finds a study in this
week's BMJ.

O'Brien and colleagues analysed recorded outbreaks of
infectious intestinal diseases in private households in
England and Wales from 1992 to 1999.

General outbreaks (outbreaks affecting more than one
household) accounted for 226 (5%) of the 4604
outbreaks reported during the surveillance period. Of
4602 people affected, 205 (4.5%) were admitted to
hospital. The risk of hospitalisation from outbreaks
linked to the home was higher than that linked with
outbreaks related to other premises.

Food was the predominant transmitter of infectious
intestinal disease and seemed to occur when individuals
catered for larger groups than usual ? for example,
barbecues and dinner parties ? more frequently than
other modes of transmission were. The most frequently
reported pathogen was salmonella.

Poultry, desserts containing raw egg, and egg dishes
were commonly implicated. The most common faults in
food hygiene were inappropriate storage, inadequate
cooking, and cross contamination.

The downward trend in general outbreaks linked with
the home is encouraging and mirrors the national
decrease in salmonella infection, conclude the authors.

Contact:

Sarah O'Brien, Consultant Epidemiologist,
Gastrointestinal Diseases Division, Public Health
Laboratory Service Communicable Disease
Surveillance Centre, London, UK
Email:  sobrien@phls.org.uk
 

(4)  CURRENT NHS APPOINTMENT SYSTEMS "ARE
STALE, AT BEST"

(Editorial: Non-attendance at general practices and
outpatient clinics)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1081

More flexible appointment systems at NHS outpatient
clinics and general practices are needed to reduce rates
of non-attendance, particularly among deprived
populations, suggest researchers in this week's BMJ.

Non-attendance at outpatient clinics in the United
Kingdom are thought to range from 5% to 34% and in
general practices, figures of 3% and 6.5% have been
reported.

Non-attenders are less likely to own a car or a
telephone and are more likely to be unemployed.
Patients with lower paid jobs may have difficulty in
getting time off work or arranging childcare. These
reasons also partly explain the peak age range of 20-30
in non-attenders, as this is the usual age for raising a
family, explain the authors.

The strategy of overbooking appointments to allow for
anticipated non-attendance may be counterproductive,
say the authors. Not only does 100% attendance put
pressure on both patients and staff, but overbooking
means that the appointment time is rarely met, so
patients have to clear their commitments for the whole
morning or afternoon. For some people this is
impossible, and for others the difficulty may be enough
to tip the balance towards not attending.

Several hospitals have instituted systems offering
patients a choice of time and date, which have resulted
in reductions in non-attendance of up to 60%, say the
authors. However, increasing flexibility and therefore
the complexity of appointment systems carries a risk.
For instance, patients who cannot read English, because
of learning difficulties or cultural background, may be
disadvantaged with newer systems.

No single solution will work across the NHS, say the
authors. Local trusts in primary and secondary care
should be able to devise local systems to allow
convenient access for their patients. "If some of these
measures are adopted non-attendance should fall,
though it will never disappear � we are all human," they
conclude.

Contact:

Deborah Sharp, Professor of Primary Health Care,
University of Bristol, UK
Email: debbie.sharp@bris.ac.uk
 

(5)  INTENSIVE TREATMENT DOES NOT REDUCE
VIOLENCE IN PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS

(Reducing violence in severe mental illness: randomised
controlled trial of intensive case management compared
with standard care)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1093

(Editorial: reducing violence in severe mental illness)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7321/1080

Increasing the intensity of treatment does not reduce the
level of violence in patients with severe mental illness,
concludes a study in this week's BMJ.

Walsh and colleagues identified 708 patients aged
between 18 and 65 with established psychotic illness in
four inner city mental health services. Over a two-year
period, 353 patients received intensive case
management and 355 patients received standard care.
Physical assault during the study was measured by
interviews with patients and case managers and
examination of case notes.

During the two years of the trial, 80 (23%) of the
intensive case management group and 78 (22%) of the
standard care group committed assault, representing no
significant difference. Risk factors for violence included
a history of violence, drug misuse, younger age,
victimisation, and learning difficulties. Even after taking
these factors into account, no evidence that intensive
case management reduced the level of violent behaviour
was found.

Legislation for compulsory community treatment in
England and Wales has recently been proposed in a
government white paper, say the authors. Future
research should address the question of whether such
treatment combined with psychosocial support can be
developed. These need to be effective in reducing
violence in a core group of mentally disordered people,
they conclude.

Contact:

Elizabeth Walsh, Clinical Lecturer, Guy's, King's and St
Thomas's School of Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry,
London, UK
Email: sppmemw@iop.kcl.ac.uk


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ