Releases Saturday 2 February 2002
No 7332 Volume 324

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).



(1) DEATHS AT BRISTOL NOT EXPLAINED BY
LOW VOLUME OF OPERATIONS

(2) GENES ARE OF LITTLE IMPORTANCE IN
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

(3) VIBRATING COMPUTER GAMES SHOULD
CARRY HEALTH WARNINGS

(4) WOMEN WANT TO BE ASKED ABOUT
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

(5) SHOULD WOMEN BE SCREENED FOR
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?




(1) DEATHS AT BRISTOL NOT EXPLAINED BY
LOW VOLUME OF OPERATIONS

(Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac
surgery: retrospective study based on routinely
collected data)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/261

Deaths among young children undergoing heart surgery
are lower in hospitals that carry out a high number of
these operations, even when data from Bristol Royal
Infirmary are excluded, confirms a study in this week's
BMJ. However, this does not explain the high number
of deaths at Bristol, despite being a hospital with a low
volume of cases.

David Spiegelhalter, a senior scientist at the Institute of
Public Health in Cambridge, used data from 12 English
hospitals carrying out heart surgery on children from
1991 to 1995. His analysis excluded results from
Bristol.

He found strong and consistent evidence that hospitals
performing a higher number of open heart operations in
children aged under 1 year tended to have a lower
death rate. For instance, a hospital carrying out 120
operations per year during this period would be
expected to have a 25% lower death rate than a
hospital carrying out only 40 such operations.

Including the results from Bristol strengthened this
association. Furthermore, only a small proportion (less
than a fifth) of the excess deaths seen at the Bristol
over this period was due to the hospital's lower volume
of surgery, adds the author.

Considerable caution is needed in interpreting these
results and the policy implications are unclear, stresses
the author. It does not necessary follow that
concentrating resources in fewer centres would reduce
deaths, he concludes.

Contact:

The author of this study is unavailable. An alternative
contact is: The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of
Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons
of England, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, UK

(2) GENES ARE OF LITTLE IMPORTANCE IN
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

(Relative importance of genetic effects in rheumatoid
arthritis: historical cohort study of Danish nationwide
twin population)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/264

Genes are of little importance in the development of
rheumatoid arthritis, finds a study in this week's BMJ.

Researchers in Denmark surveyed over 37,000 twins
about rheumatic diseases. Twin studies are one of the
simplest ways to unravel the relative importance of
genetic and environmental effects of a disease. Twins
who reported that they had rheumatoid arthritis were
invited to have a clinical examination.

Rheumatoid arthritis was verified in 13 identical and 36
non-identical twins. No identical twins and only two
pairs of non-identical twins both had rheumatoid
arthritis, suggesting that rheumatoid arthritis is no more
common in identical twins than non-identical twins.

Despite some study limitations, the authors conclude
that environmental effects may be more important than
genetic effects in the development of rheumatoid
arthritis.

This study cannot disprove a genetic component in
susceptability to rheumatoid arthritis, writes Professor
Alan Silman in an accompanying commentary.
However, the results emphasise that the genetic effects
are weak compared with environmental ones in
explaining differences in occurrence of disease.

Contact:

Anders Svendsen, Specialist Registrar, Department of
Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Email: anders.svendsen@ouh.fyns-amt.dk

(3) VIBRATING COMPUTER GAMES SHOULD
CARRY HEALTH WARNINGS

(Letter: Hand-arm vibration syndrome may be
associated with prolonged use of vibrating computer
games)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/301/a

Prolonged use of vibrating computer games by children
may be linked to a condition known as hand-arm
vibration syndrome and should carry health warnings,
suggest researchers in this week's BMJ.

They describe a case of a 15 year old boy who visited
hospital with a two year history of painful hands. His
hands became white and swollen when exposed to the
cold and then red and painful on warming.

The boy spent up to seven hours a day playing
computer games, and particularly enjoyed driving
games using the vibration mode on the hand held
control device.

His symptoms are typical of the hand-arm vibration
syndrome caused by the prolonged use of industrial
tools, such as gas powered chain saws and pneumatic
tools, say the authors. This syndrome was recognised
as an industrial disease in 1985 and has led to changes
in working practices.

Injuries associated with the use of computers or their
accessories include joystick digit and mouse elbow,
but no cases of hand-arm vibration syndrome linked to
prolonged use of vibrating hand held computer devices
have previously been reported, they add.

"We believe that, with increasing numbers of children
playing these devices, there should be consideration for
statutory health warnings to advise users and parents.
We encourage paediatricians encountering health
related effects of using these devices to report their
findings," they conclude.

Contacts:

Gavin Cleary, Specialist Registrar, Great Ormond
Street Children's Hospital, London, UK
Email: gavin.cleary@talk21.com

Dr J Sills, Consultant Paediatric Rheumatologist, Alder
Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK

(4) WOMEN WANT TO BE ASKED ABOUT
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

(Reported frequency of domestic violence: cross
sectional survey of women attending general practice)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/271

(Editorial: Preventing domestic violence)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/253

Doctors may be able to identify women who
experience domestic violence by asking them if they
are afraid of their partner, finds a study in this week's
BMJ.

Women attending 22 general practices in Ireland were
surveyed about domestic violence. Of the 1,692
women who had ever had a sexual relationship nearly
40% had experienced violent behaviour, but only 5%
recalled being asked about it by their doctor.

Yet, 77% of women said that it would be "all right" for
their doctor to ask about violence in relationships.

Women who reported domestic violence were much
more likely to be afraid of their partner and to have
experienced controlling behaviour (e.g. being shouted
or screamed at) than women who did not report such
violence.

For general practitioners and doctors in accident and
emergency, asking women about fear of their partner
and controlling behaviours may be an acceptable and
effective way of identifying those who are experiencing
domestic violence, conclude the authors.

Contact:

Tom O'Dowd, Professor of General Practice, Trinity
College Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and
Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Email: todowd@tcd.ie

(5) SHOULD WOMEN BE SCREENED FOR
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

(Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in
primary care)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/274

(Editorial: Preventing domestic violence)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/253

Over a third of women attending general practices
have experienced physical violence, but doctors and
nurses rarely ask about it. Researchers in this week's
BMJ ask:

Should women be screened for domestic violence
when they visit their general practitioner?

Is there a high risk group of women for whom
screening might be more appropriate?

Is screening acceptable to women?

A sample of women visiting 13 general practices in
Hackney, east London were surveyed about different
aspects of domestic violence. Of 1,035 women, 41%
had experienced physical violence from a partner or
former partner. Yet, for most of these women, definite
or suspected domestic violence was not recorded in
their medical notes.

Pregnancy within the past 12 months doubled the risk
of physical violence, suggesting that pregnant women
are at high risk and that screening could be more
appropriate for this group of women than for other
groups, say the authors.

One in five women objected to routine questioning
about domestic violence. This limited acceptability, and
the absence of evidence of benefit to women from
screening for domestic violence, means the case for
screening is not convincing and its introduction would
be premature, say the authors.

In the meantime, health professionals should maintain a
high level of awareness of the possibility of domestic
violence, especially in pregnant women, they conclude.

Contacts:

Jo Richardson, Research Fellow, Barts and The
London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and
Dentistry, London, UK
Email: jo.richardson@gp-F84710.nhs.uk

Gene Feder, Professor of Primary Care Research and
Development


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)