This week in the BMJ

Volume 324, Number 7341, Issue of 6 Apr 2002

[Down]Meningococcal C vaccination is cost effective
[Down]Intensive follow up after surgery for colorectal cancer improves survival
[Down]Parents recognise benefits of postmortems
[Down]Visual aids help patients understand risk
[Down]Change in psychological agreement makes doctors unhappy
[Down]A new agreement is needed if the NHS is to reform
[Down]NICE is not fulfilling its promise

Meningococcal C vaccination is cost effective

The meningococcal C vaccination campaign, launched in November 1999, has rapidly reduced the incidence of serotype C meningococcal disease in the target age groups. Using cost effectiveness analysis, Trotter and Edmunds (p 809) estimate the cost per life saved to be £6259 and find vaccination to be most cost effective when the incidence of the disease is high. School based vaccination is more cost effective than the routine vaccination of infants because delivery costs are lower and fewer doses are required. Immunisation of infants aged under 1 year was least cost effective, as a three dose schedule is required.



[To top]


Intensive follow up after surgery for colorectal cancer improves survival

Intensive follow up after colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduction in all cause mortality. A systematic review of five trials including 1342 patients by Renehan and colleagues (p 813) found a 9-13% reduction in mortality in trials that used computed tomography and frequent measurements of serum carcinoembryonic antigen to follow up patients. The authors conclude that this reduction is due to all recurrences of cancer, and particularly isolated recurrent disease, being detected early. This study counteracts the lack of direct evidence for intensive follow up after initial curative treatment for colorectal cancer.



[To top]


Parents recognise benefits of postmortems

Parents who have lost a baby view the postmortem examination as a useful and necessary tool in helping to discover the reasons why their baby died. The most common reasons given for agreeing to a postmortem examination were wanting more information about what had happened and helping to improve medical knowledge and research, say Rankin and colleagues (p 816). Parents who did not agree to a postmortem examination felt their baby had suffered enough, but some had regrets about their decision. One said: "Now, two years later, I would like to know why they died," and another: "An answer may have alleviated the burden of guilt." The authors say that all medical staff involved in obtaining consent for postmortem examinations should be fully trained in how to ask for parental consent, the postmortem examination procedure, and how to explain the findings.



[To top]


Visual aids help patients understand risk

Patients want more information in a more understandable format. Decision aids such as booklets, tapes, videodiscs, interactive computer programs, and paper based charts are tools that can easily be used to improve communication. In their clinical review, Edwards and colleagues (p 827) discuss how professionals can support patients in making choices by turning raw data into more helpful information. "Framing manipulations" of information, such as using information about relative risk in isolation of base rates, should be avoided. Decision aids can be useful as they often include visual presentations of risk information and relate the information to more familiar risks.



[To top]


Change in psychological agreement makes doctors unhappy

One major reason why doctors are unhappy seems to be a change in the relationship between the profession, employers, patients, and society, so that the job is now different to what doctors expected. Workload and pay, although important, do not fully explain the problem. In response to Richard Smith's editorial (BMJ 2001;322:1073-4[Full Text]), Edwards and colleagues (p 835) report on the reasons discussed at seminars on the subject of doctors' unhappiness held in Massachusetts and London last year. They also looked at literature from around the world. They propose that a new agreement that is more acceptable to the profession is needed and that clinical leaders have a crucial role in developing it.
 
(Credit: PAXTON/FARROW/SPL)
 
(Credit: WWW.SHOUTPICTURES.COM)




[To top]


A new agreement is needed if the NHS is to reform

The implicit agreement between the government, the medical profession, and the public (on which the NHS was established) has been undermined over the years and needs to be updated, say Ham and Alberti (p 838). They recommend that a new, explicit agreement is needed, based on patients' rights, public responsibilities, greater accountability of the medical profession, resources, partnerships, support for effective care, and stewardship. Such an agreement can only be reached if representatives of the medical profession, the public, and the government trust each other and believe they are working towards common goals. This will not be easy, they say, but it is essential to enable the different partners to make an effective contribution to the reform of the NHS.
 
(Credit: BARRY BATCHELOR/PA)




[To top]


NICE is not fulfilling its promise

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) does not currently fulfil its promise to give guidance on interventions of uncertain value and provide clinical guidelines and clinical audit packages. This is because there is ambiguity about how NICE reaches its conclusions and uncertainty about the impact of guidance on the NHS and about who monitors compliance. As a result, NICE's impact is uncertain and geographical inequity in the provision of health services is likely to persist. Dent and Sadler (p 842) consider what NICE needs to succeed and how its chances could be improved. They conclude that there needs to be wider debate about criteria, clarity on status, and more concise recommendations about clinical audit methods.



[To top]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ