This week in the BMJ

Volume 325, Number 7358, Issue of 3 Aug 2002

[Down]Travel medicine---a growing specialty
[Down]Olanzapine increases risk of diabetes
[Down]Daily progestogen protects the endometrium
[Down]Trust mergers do not save money
[Down]Home blood pressure testing is preferred
[Down]Trials funded by for profit organisations favour the intervention
[Down]New cancer drugs: little extra benefit, higher price
[Down]Learning from adverse incidents

Travel medicine---a growing specialty

Malaria is an important health risk, as cases continue to rise due to the increase in international travel. International arrivals worldwide by any form of transport were around 664 million in 2000, and an 80% increase in travel to long haul destinations is expected by 2010. On page 260 Jane Zuckerman outlines the recent developments in travel medicine, which has grown rapidly in response to the needs of the travelling population. Specialists in travel medicine, she says, have to consider diverse aspects of travel related health, including fitness to travel and health related risks of travelling.



[To top]


Olanzapine increases risk of diabetes

Patients taking olanzapine are at higher risk of developing diabetes than those taking conventional antipsychotic drugs, say Koro and colleagues (p 243). Patients taking the antipsychotic risperidone had a non-significant increased risk. The authors say that weight gain and disruption of glucose metabolism are possible mechanisms for the association between diabetes and use of antipsychotics---and doctors should consider the metabolic consequences of antipsychotics.



[To top]


Daily progestogen protects the endometrium

Hormone replacement therapies that include continuous progestogen are associated with less endometrial damage, when used long term, than sequential oestrogen-progestogen regimens. A prospective study by Wells and colleagues (p 239) found no cases of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy in women taking combined therapy. Continuous daily progestogen, the authors say, seems to keep the endometrium normal and correct hyperplasia that may develop during standard sequential regimens.



[To top]


Trust mergers do not save money

Mergers of NHS trusts do not achieve target savings in management costs in the first two years after merger and can have unintended negative consequences that disrupt services, and set back developments in services. In a cross sectional study of nine trusts, and case study in four trusts Fulop and colleagues (p 246) conclude that the benefits of mergers were mostly the stated objectives, but drawbacks arose during the process of merging, and were not considered when the decision on whether to merge was made.



[To top]


Home blood pressure testing is preferred

Patients rate home measurements of blood pressure as the most acceptable method of blood pressure assessment. Little and colleagues (p 254) recruited 200 patients to test the acceptability of different methods of the repeated measuring of blood pressure. They found that 10% of patients regarded measurement by a doctor as the most acceptable method, 18% preferred ambulatory monitoring, and 23% preferred measurement by a nurse, whereas 44% of the patients rated home measurement as the "best measurement for them."
 
(Credit: ULRIKE PREUSS)




[To top]


Trials funded by for profit organisations favour the intervention

Authors' conclusions in randomised clinical trials were significantly more favourable towards the experimental intervention when trials were funded only by for profit organisations. In Kjaergard and Als-Nielsen's study of trials published in the BMJ (p 249), authors' conclusions were appraised on a six point scale and compared with financial, personal, academic, or political competing interests. The association, the authors say, could occur because for profit organisations, by skill or by chance, fund only those trials in which the intervention is better than the control, or it could be due to publication bias.



[To top]


New cancer drugs: little extra benefit, higher price

New anticancer drugs reaching the European market in 1995-2000 offer few or no substantial advantages over existing preparations yet cost several times as much. Garattini and Bertele' (p 269) outline the features of the 12 new anticancer drugs approved for marketing and say that the general population of cancer patients will gain no benefit from them. It is hoped, however, that some new anticancer drugs, such as anti-angiogenic agents and resistant revertants, will soon undergo adequate clinical testing and show benefits over current treatments.
 
(Credit: RAY TANG/REX)




[To top]


Learning from adverse incidents

Adverse incidents with medical devices are caused by a variety of factors and not simply by faulty devices or user error. Each year about 400 people are killed or seriously injured in adverse incidents with medical devices. Amoore and Ingram (p 272) describe the development of a feedback note on adverse incidents; the note describes the incident and gives generic details of the equipment and lessons to be learnt by staff. A careful analysis of each adverse incident, the authors say, can reveal the multifactorial causes of the incident and the good practices that can help minimise repetitions.



[To top]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ