Releases Saturday 7 December 2002
No 7376 Volume 325

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).


(1) NURSES NO WORSE THAN JUNIOR DOCTORS IN
ASSESSING PATIENTS BEFORE SURGERY

(2) GENITAL INFECTION MAY BE LINKED TO
MISCARRIAGE

(3) PATIENTS SHOULD BE MORE INVOLVED IN THE
CLINICAL TRIAL PROCESS

(4) NURSING SHORTAGE MIGHT NOT EXIST

(5) ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES MAY HELP PEOPLE
WITH DEMENTIA




(1) NURSES NO WORSE THAN JUNIOR DOCTORS IN
ASSESSING PATIENTS BEFORE SURGERY

(Effectiveness of appropriately trained nurses in preoperative
assessment: randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority
trial)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7376/1323

Reform of junior doctors' hours has increased the pressure to
use non-medical staff to assess patients before surgery. A
study in this week's BMJ finds that appropriately trained
nurses perform no worse than pre-registration house officers
in preoperative assessment, although neither group performed
particularly well.

Researchers identified 1,874 patients attending four NHS
hospitals for assessment before surgery. House officers
assessed 926 patients and appropriately trained nurses
assessed 948 patients. A specialist registrar examined each
patient after the nurse or house officer to judge their
performance.

Patients faced a one in seven chance of a house officer failing
to detect something that might affect their management and a
one in eight chance of an appropriately trained nurse doing the
same.

Nurses were judged to be non-inferior to house officers,
although there was variation among them in terms of the
quality of history taking. House officers ordered nearly twice
as many unnecessary tests as nurses.

For most hospitals in the United Kingdom there will not be
enough house officers to carry out pre-operative assessment,
say the authors. However, they conclude that some
pre-operative assessment is necessary for their training, and so
they cannot be entirely replaced by nurses, even if this is seen
as a role within which nurses could develop a career.

Contact:

John Primrose, Professor of Surgery, University of
Southampton School of Medicine, Southampton General
Hospital, Southampton, UK
Email: j.n.primrose@soton.ac.uk

(2) GENITAL INFECTION MAY BE LINKED TO
MISCARRIAGE

(Association between bacterial vaginosis or chlamydial
infection and miscarriage before 16 weeks' gestation:
prospective community based cohort study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7376/1334

The genital infection, bacterial vaginosis, may be linked to
miscarriage during the second trimester of pregnancy (13-15
weeks), concludes a study in this week's BMJ.

Researchers at St George's Hospital Medical School identified
1,216 pregnant women attending 32 general practices and five
family planning clinics in London who were less than 10 weeks
into their pregnancy.

Women were asked to provide a self administered vaginal
swab and to complete a questionnaire at 16 weeks. The
questionnaire asked about personal characteristics, medical
history, and pregnancy outcome.

Overall, 121 women miscarried before 16 weeks and 174
had bacterial vaginosis. Those who were positive for bacterial
vaginosis had a higher risk of miscarriage at 13-15 weeks
compared with women who were negative for the infection.

Although bacterial vaginosis is not a strong predictor of early
miscarriage, it is associated with miscarriage in the second
trimester at 13-15 weeks, say the authors. The presence of
chlamydial infection was too low for it to be a major risk
factor for miscarriage.

The study also shows that screening for genital infections using
self administered vaginal swabs is feasible in pregnant women
in the community. This might be important for prevention of
adverse outcomes related to infection later in pregnancy, they
conclude.

Contacts:

Phillip Hay, Senior Lecturer, Department of Genitourinary
Medicine, St George's' Hospital Medical School, London,
UK

or

Pippa Oakeshott, Senior Lecturer in General Practice,
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St
George's' Hospital Medical School, London, UK
Email: oakeshot@sghms.ac.uk

(3) PATIENTS SHOULD BE MORE INVOLVED IN THE
CLINICAL TRIAL PROCESS

(Informing participants of allocation to placebo at trial closure:
postal survey)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7376/1329

Patients should be treated as participants rather than subjects
during clinical trials, suggest researchers in this week's BMJ.

At present, less than half of patients receiving placebo as part
of a clinical trial are informed about their treatment when the
trial is over, despite government recommendations to ensure
that that the public have confidence in, and benefit from,
quality research.

The team surveyed 107 investigators who published a placebo
controlled randomised trial published in 2000 in five leading
medical journals.

Over half (55%) of investigators did not inform any participant
of their treatment allocation, or only informed those who
asked. The main reasons for not informing participants were
that the investigators never considered this option or that they
wanted to avoid biasing results.

It is possible that the placebo response may be disrupted
when the treatment is unmasked to patients, say the authors.
For instance, a recent trial evaluating the effects of
antidepressants found that when placebo responders were
told that they were receiving a placebo their mood
deteriorated. However, patients must be well informed to
avoid negative thoughts, misconceptions, or mistrust in health
professionals.

Effective and sensitive was of communicating treatment
information to trial participants are required, they conclude.

Contacts:

Zelda Di Blasi, PhD Student, Department of Health Sciences,
University of York, UK Tel (currently in California, USA ?
after 3pm UK time: +1 415 642 7877 Email:
zdb1@york.ac.uk

or

Jos Kleijnen, Director, NHS Centre for Reviews and
Dissemination, University of York, UK Tel (Thurs 5 Dec pm
only): +44 (0)1904 433 647

(4) NURSING SHORTAGE MIGHT NOT EXIST

(Letter: Retaining nurses in the NHS)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7376/1362

The true extent of the NHS nursing shortage - if it exists at all
- will be known only when nurses spend all their time nursing,
argues Professor Steven Lewis in this week's BMJ.

Evidence from the United States, Canada, and Germany has
found that nurses spend time performing functions not related
to their professional skills, such as cleaning rooms or moving
food trays. Nurses also reported more pressure to take up
management responsibility, taking them away from the direct
care of patients.

This means that, although a shortage of professional nursing
may exist, a shortage of nurses might not. Nurses spend much
of their time doing things that should be delegated to others
and not enough of their time doing what they are educated to
do. This is inefficient and demoralising and accounts for at
least some of the widespread job dissatisfaction in the
profession, says the author.

Increasing the supply of new nurses may turn out to be
perversely ineffective, he adds. If overall numbers grow,
nurses perform even more non-nursing tasks, and system
costs rise because highly trained people are used inefficiently.

"Only when nurses are allowed to withdraw from areas of
non-nursing activity and do what they should be doing will we
know the true extent of the nursing shortage±if it exists at all.

Achieving a proper division of labour that respects and
maximises professionals' competencies will make the
healthcare system more effective and efficient. It will also
create a better motivated and contented workforce," he
concludes.

Contact:

Steven Lewis, Adjunct Professor of Health Policy, Calgary,
Canada
Email: Steven.Lewis@shaw.ca

(5) ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES MAY HELP PEOPLE
WITH DEMENTIA

(Editorial: Sensory stimulation in dementia)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7376/1312

Aromatherapy and bright light treatment may have an
important role in managing behavioural problems in people
with dementia, conclude researchers in this week's BMJ.

Most older people with dementia develop psychiatric
symptoms or behavioural disturbances such as agitation,
aggression, depression, delusions, wandering, sleep
disturbance, and hallucinations. Drugs such as neuroleptics
and other sedatives are often prescribed but are associated
with side effects.

A wide range of alternative approaches has been tried but
reports have essentially been qualitative and based on small
numbers of patients. However, two exceptions are
aromatherapy and bright light treatment, which have emerged
as promising treatments, write the authors.

Three trials on aromatherapy in the last year have reported a
significant beneficial effect on agitation compared with placebo
with almost complete compliance and no side effects. Lemon
balm or lavender oil are the two main agents used and are
delivered by either inhalation or skin application.

Three recent trials on bright light therapy have also shown a
particularly beneficial effect on sleep disturbance.

People with dementia are among the most vulnerable in our
society, say the authors. Symptoms often need to be treated
expediently, and drugs, although moderately effective, can be
hazardous. Aromatherapy and bright light treatment seem to
be safe and effective and may have an important role in
managing behavioural problems in people with dementia, they
conclude.

Contact:

Alistair Burns, Professor of Old Age Psychiatry, University of
Manchester Department of Psychiatry, Wythenshawe
Hospital, Manchester, UK


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)