This week in the BMJ

Volume 325, Number 7376, Issue of 7 Dec 2002

[Down]Nurses can carry out preoperative assessment
[Down]Bacterial vaginosis is not a strong risk factor for early miscarriage
[Down]Participants may never know which arm of the trial they were in
[Down]Doctors overlook living wills
[Down]Short courses in evidence based medicine can work

Nurses can carry out preoperative assessment

Appropriately trained nurses are no worse than preregistration house officers in assessing patients before elective surgery. In a randomised controlled trial Kinley and colleagues (p 1323) compared preoperative assessment carried out by nurses with that carried out by house officers. They found few differences in history taken and physical examinations, but house officers ordered substantially more unnecessary tests, which has economic implications. Reforms in postgraduate medical training and the introduction of reduced working hours have increased pressure to substitute non-medical staff for preregistration house officers. The authors conclude that there is no contraindication to the development of nurse led preoperative assessment, although house officers will have to continue to undertake some of the work to satisfy training requirements.
 
(Credit: PHANIE/REX)




[To top]


Bacterial vaginosis is not a strong risk factor for early miscarriage

Bacterial vaginosis is not a strong risk factor for miscarriage before 16 weeks' gestation, but it may be associated with miscarriage in the second trimester. Oakeshott and colleagues (p 1334) conducted a prospective cohort study of 1216 pregnant women attending general practices and family planning clinics. Although treatment of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis is unlikely to prevent miscarriage in the first trimester, initiatives to prevent miscarriage in the second trimester and preterm birth should consider screening and treatment before 13 weeks' gestation. Non-invasive screening for bacterial vaginosis by using self-administered vaginal swaps is feasible in community based, healthy pregnant women.



[To top]


Participants may never know which arm of the trial they were in

Less than half of investigators inform participants about their treatment allocation at the end of a trial. Di Blasi and colleagues (p 1329) surveyed more than 200 investigators of placebo controlled clinical trials published in five leading medical journals in 2000 or registered in the national research register. Overall, 40% of investigators had never considered informing participants. Nearly a quarter of investigators were worried that disclosure would bias results at follow up of the study. These findings challenge a recent report from the Department of Health stating that once research findings are established, principal investigators must feed back findings to participants or their representatives. More effective and sensitive ways of communicating treatment allocation to participants are needed, as well as information on the effects on placebo responders.



[To top]


Doctors overlook living wills

In patients with advanced dementia, doctors' decisions to withhold the artificial administration of fluids and food are based more on the medical condition of the patient, the family's wishes, and care providers' interpretations of the patient's quality of life than they are on living wills and policy agreements. In an ethnographic study, The and colleagues (p 1326) studied the practice of withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from patients with advanced dementia in two nursing homes in the Netherlands. Fluids and food were mainly given artificially when there was an acute illness or a condition that needed medical treatment and required hydration to be effective. When faced with uncertainties about what the patient wanted, doctors tried to create the broadest possible basis for the decision making process by involving the family.
 
(Credit: LEHTIKUVA OY/REX)




[To top]


Short courses in evidence based medicine can work

Short courses in evidence based medicine can lead to a clinically relevant increase in knowledge and skills, which is a prerequisite for evidence based practice. In a three year study among postgraduate doctors in Germany, Fritsche and colleagues (p 1338) investigated the effectiveness of teaching evidence based medicine. Using a specifically developed and validated instrument, they confirmed a short term change in knowledge and skills. The instrument reliably distinguished knowledge and skills between groups with different levels of expertise. Recent reviews, mostly based on low quality studies, had queried the benefit of short courses in evidence based medicine.



[To top]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ