Releases Saturday 6 September 2003
No 7414 Volume 327

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).


(1) HEART FAILURE IS MORE COMMON BUT LESS
FATAL IN SOUTH ASIAN PEOPLE

(2) SHOULD AMBULANCE CREWS PERFORM
EMERGENCY BREATHING PROCEDURE?

(3) TEXT MESSAGES COULD LEAD TO HEALTH
INEQUALITIES

(4) CONCERNS OVER NATIONAL POLICY ON
INFERTILITY TREATMENT



(1) HEART FAILURE IS MORE COMMON BUT LESS
FATAL IN SOUTH ASIAN PEOPLE

(Prognosis for South Asian and white patients newly
admitted to hospital with heart failure in the United
Kingdom: historical cohort study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7414/526

In the UK, more South Asian people are admitted to
hospital with heart failure but are less likely to die than
white people, according to a study in this week's BMJ.

Researchers in Leicestershire compared hospital
admissions and deaths from heart failure in 5,789 South
Asian and white patients between 1998 and 2001.

Compared with white patients, the incidence of heart
failure was up to four times higher in South Asian
patients. At the time of first hospital admission, South
Asians were also on average eight years younger and
were more likely to have heart disease or diabetes than
white patients. Yet survival was similar, if not better, for
South Asian patients.

These findings are clinically important to the UK South
Asian population, among whom heart disease and
diabetes are common, say the authors. They also
indicate that ethnicity is a significant factor in the
development and course of the disease.

Further studies are required to define the cause, clinical
course, and prognosis of heart failure in different
communities worldwide, they conclude.

Contact:

Iain Squire, Senior Lecturer, University of Leicester
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Leicester
Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
Email: is11@le.ac.uk

(2) SHOULD AMBULANCE CREWS PERFORM
EMERGENCY BREATHING PROCEDURE?

(Prehospital tracheal intubation in severely injured
patients: a Danish observational study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7414/533

A study in this week's BMJ questions whether
ambulance crews can master the skills needed to provide
emergency intubation (passing a breathing tube down the
throat of severely injured patients) before they reach
hospital.

Researchers in Denmark identified 220 severely injured
patients who were intubated out of hospital by a mobile
emergency care unit, staffed with an anaesthetist,
between 1998 and 2000.

The mobile unit brought 172 of these patients to hospital,
and 74 (43%) were intubated before reaching hospital.
Of these, 62 (84%) received anaesthetics.

Thirty-six (58%) of patients who were given anaesthetics
and one (8%) who were not survived at least six months.
These results contrast with a study of the emergency
helicopter service in London, which found intubation
without drugs was hopeless.

The environment out of hospital is different from in
hospital and support and resources are limited, say the
authors. "We question whether anaesthesia and
intubation of trauma patients can be mastered and
routinely be maintained by ambulance personnel."

Contact:

Erika Christensen, Consultant Anaesthetist, Department
of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine,
University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark
Email: erika@akh.aaa.dk

(3) TEXT MESSAGES COULD LEAD TO HEALTH
INEQUALITIES

(Letters: reminding patients by text message)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7414/564

Reminding patients of appointments with their doctor by
text messages is generally a good idea, but may increase
health inequalities, according to a letter in this week's
BMJ.

Sending text reminders is clearly a good initiative, but
one concern is that it may increase health inequalities as it
applies only to people who can afford to own mobile
phones, argues Daragh Fahey, a public health doctor at
Camden Primary Care Trust, London.

This means that people in higher socioeconomic groups
are less likely to miss appointments and thus are more
likely to receive better health care, he concludes.

Contact:

Daragh Fahey, Camden Primary Care Trust, St Pancras
Hospital, London, UK
Email: daragh.fahey@camdenpct.nhs.uk

(4) CONCERNS OVER NATIONAL POLICY ON
INFERTILITY TREATMENT

(Editorial: In vitro fertilisation for all?)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7414/511

Decisions about providing fertility treatment on the NHS
should be made locally according to need and priority,
rather than through national policy, argues a leading
medical ethicist in this week's BMJ.

His comments follow guidelines by the National Institute
of Clinical Excellence (NICE) that all couples meeting
certain criteria should have up to three cycles of in vitro
fertilisation free on the NHS.

The debate about publicly funding assisted conception is
in essence a debate about values and priorities rather
than a debate about what works, writes Richard
Ashcroft of Imperial College London. Under a publicly
funded NHS it is a political decision, not a clinical one,
about how far we as a society want to provide fertility
services and to whom. Even with these guidelines it is
unclear whether the government will ensure that
appropriate resources are made available centrally. It is
more likely that the guidelines will simply have to fit into
existing locally made spending plans, he adds.

The guidelines from NICE temper local arbitrariness and
unfairness, but they also tie the hands of the local
decision makers whose job it is to set priorities.

We should be wary of making reproduction a major
theme in our national politics, he warns. As long as
people have reliable information and decision makers are
accountable for the reasonableness of their decisions,
why should there be national policy?

Contact:

Richard Ashcroft, Leverhulme Senior Lecturer in
Medical Ethics, Department of Primary Health Care and
General Practice, Imperial College London, London,
UK
Email: r.ashcroft@imperial.ac.uk


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)