Releases Saturday 31 January 2004
No 7434 Volume 328

Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).

If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).


(1) UK FACES ASBESTOS EPIDEMIC

(2) ACTION NEEDED TO AVOID HIV DRUG
RESISTANCE IN AFRICA

(3) CONCERN OVER THE FUTURE OF CLINICAL
TRIALS



(1) UK FACES ASBESTOS EPIDEMIC

(Radical surgery for mesothelioma)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7434/237

The United Kingdom is facing an epidemic of
mesothelioma (a malignant tumour of the lung lining)
among workers exposed to asbestos, warn senior
doctors in this week's BMJ.

There are now over 1800 mesothelioma deaths per year
in Britain (more than one in 200 of all deaths in men and
almost one in 1000 in women) and the number is still
increasing. As exposure in the UK continued until 1980
the peak of the epidemic is still to come, and we need a
strategy to manage these patients, they write.

Some patients and their doctors desperately seek radical
surgery as their only hope, but others have doubts about
the evidence.

But irrespective of whether radical surgery will be
considered, all doctors need to know how to recognise
and diagnose this disease and what treatments are
available.

This disease is increasing in frequency. There is nothing
we can do now to prevent it in workers exposed to
asbestos throughout the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, say
the authors.

What we can do is recognise it early, treat it actively,
and learn about best treatment with carefully thought out
studies because we will be seeing many more
mesotheliomas in the next 25 years. In the developed
world alone 100,000 people alive now will die from it,
they conclude.

Contact:

Professor Tom Treasure, Cardiothoracic Unit, Guy's
Hospital, London, UK
Email: tom.treasure@gstt.sthames.nhs.uk

(2) ACTION NEEDED TO AVOID HIV DRUG
RESISTANCE IN AFRICA

(Antiretroviral therapy in Africa)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7434/280

We should stop and think about the risks of resistance,
and ways of minimising them, before increasing access to
antiretroviral therapy in Africa, argue researchers in this
week's BMJ.

They warn that, without due forethought and planning,
antiretroviral therapy is likely to be introduced to Africa
in a random and haphazard way, risking rapid
transmission of drug resistance.

Resistance to every currently licensed antiretroviral drug
has been observed. The only sure way to avoid the
development of drug resistance is to adhere strictly to
therapy. Yet evidence suggests that adherence with drug
treatment in Africa is low compared with that in
industrialised nations.

Several methods of increasing adherence to treatment
have been tested throughout the developing world, but
have so far had limited success.

Another major problem in introducing antiretroviral
therapy to Africa is the inadequate infrastructure to deal
with the number of people infected, write the authors.

"We cannot afford inconsistent prescribing practices and
poor monitoring of therapy and adherence," they say. "A
rational approach is required in which systematic delivery
and proved methods for maximising adherence are as
important as procuring the drugs themselves."

Contact:

Warren Stevens, Health Economist, MRC Laboratories,
Banjul, Gambia, West Africa
Email: wstevens@mrc.gm

(3) CONCERN OVER THE FUTURE OF CLINICAL
TRIALS

(Editorial: Implementing the European clinical trials
directive)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7434/240

(Letter: Save European research campaign)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7434/286

A new European directive has prompted concerns over
the future of publicly funded clinical trials in the United
Kingdom, according to an editorial in this week's BMJ.

The European Union's clinical trials directive must be
implemented in UK law by May 2004. It is intended to
simplify and harmonise the regulation of trials across the
European Union. Yet some believe that it will actually
impede and inhibit publicly funded trials, writes Kent
Woods of the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency

The main concerns include the role and responsibilities of
trial sponsors, the delay and cost imposed by additional
bureaucracy, and new requirements for good clinical
practice.

The concern is such that researchers from all over
Europe and the world are supporting a campaign to save
European science (www.SaveEuropeanResearch.org).

In a letter in this week's issue, the campaigners argue that
little was wrong with the processes of academic or
investor led research in the European Union in the first
place, and that many important medical breakthroughs in
recent times have been a product of this mechanism.

Compliance with the directive will challenge us to review
many details of current practice. Can we find ways of
streamlining the initiation of trials without compromising
patient safety?

Contact:

Brian Moulton, Chief Executive Officer, Irish Clinical
Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Email: brian.moulton@icorg.ie


FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS

Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:

Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice@bma.org.uk)

and from:

the EurekAlert website, run by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)