Press releases Monday 6 September to Friday 10 September 2010
Please remember to credit the BMJas source when publicising an article and to tell your readers that they can
read its full text on the journal's website (http://www.bmj.com).
(1) Basic physical capability can predict mortality in later life
(Research: Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis)
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.c4467
People who are better at simple physical acts such as gripping, walking, rising from a chair and balancing on one leg are more likely to live longer, according to a new study published on bmj.com today.
Measures of physical capability, such as grip strength, walking speed, chair rising time and standing balance ability, can predict mortality in older people living in the community, UK researchers found.
These measures are related to a person's ability to perform everyday tasks. There is growing interest in using such measures as simple screening tools to identify people who might benefit from targeted interventions such as strength training.
Researchers from the MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing reviewed 57 studies and found 28 that looked at physical capabilities in people of any age and recorded subsequent mortality. They excluded studies of people in institutions such as hospitals and care homes.
Most of those study authors were contacted by the research team and asked to complete a standardised results table and ultimately, after also obtaining unpublished results from five other studies, 33 sets of results were collated and included in the review.
The team found that, although there was some variation between studies, there was consistent evidence of associations between all four measures of physical capability and mortality - people who performed less well in these tests had a consistently higher risk of death.
From 14 studies (including 53,476 participants) that dealt with grip strength, the death rate among the weakest people was 1.67 times greater than among the strongest people, after taking age, sex, and body size into account.
From five studies (including 14,692 participants) that dealt with walking speed, the death rate among people who were slowest was 2.87 times greater than among the people who were fastest, after similar adjustments.
Five studies (including 28,036 people) that dealt with chair rising showed that the death rate of people who were the slowest was almost twice the rate of people who were fastest at this physical task.
Most of the studies were carried out amongst older people, but the association of grip strength with mortality was also found in younger populations.
The authors say that this review has highlighted the paucity of studies in this field in younger populations, and they also call for more research to examine the associations between changes in capability with age and mortality, as a steep decline in physical capability may be a better predictor of mortality than is the absolute level at a single point in time.
They conclude: "Objective measures of physical capability are predictors of all cause mortality in older community dwelling populations. Such measures may therefore provide useful tools for identifying older people at higher risk of death."
Contact:
Research: Rachel Cooper, MRC career development fellow, MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, UK
Email: r.cooper@nshd.mrc.ac.uk
(2) Diagnostic errors "greatest threat to patient safety in hospitals," claims senior doctor
(Personal view: What is the main cause of avoidable harm to patients?)
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.c4593
Diagnostic errors are the most important causes of avoidable harm to patients in hospitals, warns a senior doctor on bmj.com today.
Dr Gordon Caldwell, a consultant physician at Worthing Hospital in Western Sussex argues that doctors need better facilities and sufficient time to make a correct diagnosis.
When a patient is admitted to hospital, the team of doctors formulate a "working diagnosis," he explains. At this point, the diagnosis is uncertain but the patient is treated as if the working diagnosis is correct.
"If over the next few days the patient gets better, the working diagnosis is confirmed and becomes the diagnosis," he says. However, if the patient does not improve, "we think again and consider whether the working diagnosis was wrong."
He warns: "The time taken to reach the correct diagnosis may critically impact on the patient's chances of survival. Over my career, I have seen many errors in the working diagnosis causing harm and even death to patients."
Little consideration seems to have been given to how doctors make and refine the working diagnosis and treatment plan for the patient, he adds. "We must allow clinicians enough time to be careful in diagnosis, treatment planning and treatment review."
Dr Caldwell believes that the profession has failed to let our patients and society know about this very important problem.
He concludes: "We must design our working spaces and information systems to maximise doctors' ability to see, understand, and deliberate on the information needed for more precise diagnosis. We must allow clinicians enough time to be careful in diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment review. We must urgently consider how to provide rooms, time, and information for doctors to do the most difficult part of their job and the part most prone to error: the clinical thinking in making the working diagnosis and treatment plan." health records, international experience, including England's, suggests that neither a purely top-down nor bottom-up approach will likely do so."
Contact:
Gordon Caldwell, consultant physician, Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Worthing, UK
Email: Gordon.Caldwell@wsht.nhs.uk
FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS
For more information please contact:
Emma Dickinson
Tel: +44 (0)20 7383 6529
Email: edickinson@bma.org.uk
Press Office telephone : 020 7383 6254 (Weekdays : 0900hrs - 1800hrs)
British Medical Association
BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JP
and from:
the EurekAlert website, run by the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (http://www.eurekalert.org)
http://intranet.bmj.com/departments/dept-bmj/bmj-team-resources/web-team-resources/General_blogging_principles.doc