Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
US Highlights
Here are items from recent BMJ issues that may
be of particular interest to American readers. Happy reading. Comments welcome. |
|
US editor�s choice March 25 American children now receive up to 44 vaccine injections by the time they are 18 years old. Jonathan Temte, a US family physician who is a liaison to the CDC�s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, discusses how vaccines are evaluated and recommended, using the new hepatitis A vaccine as an example. Whereas early vaccines were for diseases that were both common and serious, newer vaccines tend to be for diseases that are either common (chickenpox) or lethal (meningococcal disease) but not both. That said, most vaccines are in the rare category of interventions that are not only cost effective but also cost saving. Most experts agree that mammography can save lives by detecting breast cancer in its early, treatable stages, but how do we evaluate newer screening tests for breast cancer? Les Irwig and colleagues discuss this, illustrating the need to balance increased sensitivity (which is good) with increased overdetection (which is bad). An important question is whether new breast cancer screening tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging, need to be evaluated with long, expensive, randomized controlled trials. The answer is probably not. Whether a shorter RCT is required or an even shorter paired cross sectional study will suffice depends on how similar the new and the old tests are. Chronic low back pain is an important and common problem in primary care, often frustrating patients as well as doctors. Lisa Hsieh et al compared the effectiveness of acupressure and physical therapy for LBP in a randomized controlled trial conducted in Taiwan. They found that patients randomized to acupressure therapy had significantly better clinical outcomes, both immediately after treatment and six months later, than those who received physical therapy. The results are encouraging. In an accompanying editorial, however, Helen Frost and Sarah Stewart-Brown urge caution, pointing out that the interventions were not well described, patients could (of course) tell which treatment they received, and there is no evidence that the intervention can be exported to other doctors. More research is needed.
The obesity epidemic seems to affect everything. Anesthesiology resident Andrew Nisbet measured pelvic CT scans from 100 consecutive patients to determine whether standard gluteal intramuscular injections would indeed reach muscle in them. He found that between 12 and 72 of the patients�depending on needle selection and injection path�had too much subcutaneous fat for an IM shot. Conclusion: probably best to deliver IM injections to our increasingly heavy population via the deltoid muscle, especially in overweight patients. David Hunter and David Felson review the diagnosis and treatment of the most common cause of mobility restriction in the elderly�osteoarthritis. They emphasize that the diagnosis is mainly a clinical one and warn against ordering too many blood tests. False-positive results, which are common in the elderly, lead to much unnecessary further testing. Treatment should begin with education and non-pharmacologic interventions, including weight loss, exercise, physical therapy, and, when appropriate, knee braces. Are population approaches to prevention better than those delivered in the clinical setting? Epidemiologist Geoffrey Rose calculated 20 years ago that moving population norms of blood pressure or cholesterol a little would do a lot more than treating patients with a single risk factor, like an elevated cholesterol level. Douglas Manuel and colleagues argue that today�s multifactoral risk scores better identify patients who will benefit from therapy. Intervening in these patients will save more lives than either treating people with high cholesterols or trying to lower cholesterol in the entire population. It�s an important point. Finally, journalist
Janice Tanne reviews a
suspenseful new American reality television program, Miracle Workers,
about patients who receive life-changing or life-saving surgery. She wants
to know who gets on the show, who is paying for this surgery, and if the
surgery is so necessary why our health care system doesn�t pay for it. March 11
|
March 25
Acupressure for low back pain
Treatment of low back pain by
acupressure and physical therapy: randomised controlled trial
Child health
Clinical Review: Osteoarthritis
Preventive medicine Revisiting
Rose: strategies for reducing coronary heart disease
TV: Miracle Workers
|